Surgical Techniques   |    
Outcome of Lumbar Arthrodesis in Patients Sixty-five Years of Age or OlderSurgical Technique
Steven D. Glassman, MD1; Leah Carreon, MD, MSc1; John R. Dimar, MD1
1 Norton Leatherman Spine Center, 210 East Gray Street, Suite 900, Louisville, KY 40202. E-mail address for S.D. Glassman: tana.allgeyer@nortonhealthcare.org
View Disclosures and Other Information
DISCLOSURE: The authors did not receive any outside funding or grants in support of their research for or preparation of this work. One or more of the authors, or a member of his or her immediate family, received, in any one year, payments or other benefits in excess of $10,000 or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from commercial entities (Medtronic Sofamor Danek, DePuy, and Norton Healthcare).

Investigation performed at Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, Kentucky
The original scientific article in which the surgical technique was presented was published in JBJS Vol. 91 -A, pp. 783-90, April 2009

Copyright ©2010 American Society for Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques, 2010 Mar 01;92(Supplement 1 Part 1):77-84. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01300
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case



The value of lumbar spine arthrodesis in older patients is not well documented. As most of the literature regarding lumbar arthrodesis in older patients has focused on the prevalence of complications, the purpose of this study was to determine the clinical outcomes for older compared with younger patients undergoing lumbar arthrodesis.


We studied 224 patients who underwent a single-level posterolateral lumbar arthrodesis with an iliac crest bone graft. Outcome measures included the Oswestry Disability Index, the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 and numeric rating scales for back and leg pain, as well as a radiographic assessment of fusion. Outcome measures were evaluated on the basis of the mean change and the percentage of patients reaching a minimum clinically important difference threshold. For comparison, the patients were divided into two groups: 174 patients who were younger than sixty-five years and fifty patients who were sixty-five years of age or older.


Substantial improvements from baseline were noted in all of the clinical and health-related quality-of-life measures at the six-month, one-year, and two-year intervals. The mean improvements in the Oswestry Disability Index score at two years postoperatively were 28.5 points for the older patients and 24.5 points for the younger patients. For Short Form-36 physical component summary scores, the mean improvement from baseline was 14.2 points for the older group and 11.7 points for the younger group at two years. The older patients also demonstrated a similar or greater improvement in the numeric rating scale back and leg pain scores at all time intervals, with a significant difference in leg pain scores at two years postoperatively (10.4 points for the older patients and 6.4 points for the younger patients; p = 0.002). Perioperative complications, although an obvious concern, did not appear to adversely affect clinical and health-related quality-of-life outcomes at two years postoperatively.


This study demonstrates a substantial benefit for patients sixty-five years of age or older with degenerative disc disease who are treated with a single-level lumbar decompression and instrumented arthrodesis, and we conclude that lumbar arthrodesis is a viable and reasonable treatment option for appropriately selected patients sixty-five years of age or older.


Prognostic Level II. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


"Outcome of Lumbar Arthrodesis in Patients Sixty-five Years of Age or Older" (2009;91:783-90).

Figures in this Article
    Sign In to Your Personal ProfileSign In To Access Full Content
    Not a Subscriber?
    Get online access for 30 days for $35
    New to JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques?
    Sign up for a full subscription to both the print and online editions
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities, to comment on public articles, or to sign up for alerts.
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities
    Have a subscription to the print edition?
    Current subscribers to The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery in either the print or quarterly DVD formats receive free online access to JBJS.org.
    Forgot your password?
    Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.

    Forgot your username or need assistance? Please contact customer service at subs@jbjs.org. If your access is provided
    by your institution, please contact you librarian or administrator for username and password information. Institutional
    administrators, to reset your institution's master username or password, please contact subs@jbjs.org


    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe

    Related Content
    The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery
    Provided by:
    Essential Surgical Techniques
    JBJS Case Connector
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    JBJS Jobs
    W. Virginia - Charleston Area Medical Center
    S. Carolina - Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Medical Univerity of South Carlonina
    District of Columbia (DC) - Children's National Medical Center
    New York - Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai